<data:blog.pageTitle/>

This Page

has moved to a new address:

http://readeroffictions.com

Sorry for the inconvenienceā€¦

Redirection provided by Blogger to WordPress Migration Service
A Reader of Fictions: 2012 Ratings by Publisher

A Reader of Fictions

Book Reviews for Just About Every Kind of Book

Thursday, January 3, 2013

2012 Ratings by Publisher

In an effort to minimize the books I suffer through, I've started tracking my ratings by both publisher and imprint in a giant spreadsheet. Basically, if a certain publisher or imprint always results in bad ratings for me, I will know to just say no, at least to review copies, where I'll have to send an awkward email to a publicist.


In just a year, I don't have a ton of data for some of the pubs, so I'll just be including those where I've read a reliable sample, which I'm going to call 5 books or more. Even then, a couple of these averages are, I think, misleading, but most of them are about right. So first, here are my average ratings by publisher. Then I'll break it down further for those with imprints.


As you can see on this somewhat ridiculous bar graph, the averages range from 2.8 to 4 in the publishers I've read enough books from to include. Candlewick's, though, is one that is a bit skewed, because 4 of the 6 books I read by them this year were part of a terrible series. I'd requested book four from NetGalley, so I felt like I HAD to read them all. Because of this basic data, I've been seeking out more books from Tor and Bloomsbury, as they obviously get me.


Random House
Over the course of the year, I read 49 books from 14 different RH imprints, but in only three of them did I read more than 2 books. 

Imprint # of Books Read Average Rating
Delacorte BFYR 17 3.76
Knopf BFYR 7 3.71
Random House BFYR 9 3.44

Note how much higher two of these are than the average of 3.5 for Random House as a whole. I don't know that I've learned anything definitive yet, but Delacorte seems to be the most likely imprint for me with regards to RH teen books.

Macmillan
I only recently started working with Macmillan, so I haven't read nearly as many of their books. I read 22 books published by Macmillan from a total of 6 imprints.

Imprint # of Books Read Average Rating
St. Martin's Griffin 4 2.9
Farrar, Straus and Giraux 8 3
Feiwel & Friends 5 2.8

What I've mostly learned here, I think is that their imprints don't tell me much. Ironically, if I were going to avoid a particular one of their imprints, it would be FSG, since I seem to be almost entirely 2.5 and 3 ratings, where the others are all over the place. I won't take any action on them until I have more data though. Besides, my first Macmillan read of the new year, Marissa Meyer's Scarlet (Feiwel & Friends) was a 4.5, so...

Penguin
Penguin's the publisher I've had the longest relationship with, but, ironically, this means that they also have much lower ratings than they otherwise might have, because it took me a long time to realize that I didn't have to accept every book to for publicists to be willing to work with me. I read 49 Penguin books over 14 imprints, which is, very oddly, the exact same as for Random House.

Imprint # of Books Read Average Rating
Penguin Books 7 3.21
Viking Adult 13 3.5
Pamela Dorman Books 4 3.88
Razorbill 5 3.7

Overall, I've had a pretty good experience with Penguin's young adult offerings, but they don't work with me much, so my most read imprints, with the exception of Razorbill, are all from the adult group. In the next year, I'm going to be much more cautious accepting books from the Penguin Books imprint, since I generally like those less well than the other adult imprints.

Bloomsbury
Oh, Bloomsbury, don't you guys want me to review your books for you? No? Well, that's okay. We're still friends. I read 22 Bloomsbury books broken across 3 imprints.

Imprint # of Books Read Average Rating
Bloomsbury USA Children's 13 3.81
Walker Children's 8 4.19

Lesson: read ALL of the Bloomsbury children's books. Well, not all, but pretty much any that look good, because out of those 21, I only had one 2 and one 2.5. For me, that's insane!

Simon & Schuster
S&S didn't like me much on NG, and I only recently met any of their publicists, so there's a serious lack of data here. I read 14 Simon & Schuster books in 2012, across 7 imprints. Since I mostly read review copies, I just haven't read many of these. I wouldn't include the break down here at all, except that I find the data interesting.

Imprint # of Books Read Average Rating
Simon Pulse4 4.38
S&S BFYR 3 3.5
Touchstone 3 3

The reason I find this so interesting is that at one point on Goodreads, I observed a conversation about how some folks thought Simon & Schuster was publishing some of the worst YA books out there, and I thought it was funny how high my averages are for S&S. Now, maybe they do publish some terrible stuff, but they also publish some amazing things, obviously. Simon Pulse, especially seems awesome, but I haven't read enough for this to be definitive. Touchstone is the imprint I've gotten some review copies from, but, obviously, there books haven't stood out for me yet.

Hachette Book Group
Hachette used to be very good to me on NetGalley, but, actually, I think most of these are books I bought, borrowed from the library, or got from Orbit. I read 20 books, spread across 7 imprints.

Imprint # of Books Read Average Rating
Orbit 9 3.83
Little, Brown BFYR 5 3.6

Fun fact: Orbit is the one and only example of me sending a request for a review copy and that leading to a relationship with a publicist. All the others found me when they deemed me worthy, one way or another. In case you're curious, I requested Mira Grant's Blackout. They were kind enough to also send me Deadline. Plus, my average rating is close to a 4. Is it any surprise that I love Orbit?

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
HMH's averages for me definitely suffer from what I like to term NG syndrome. I would request anything that looked remotely interesting on NG, and, for a while there, I read ALL of the books I requested, thinking DNFing was  rude. Thus, I ended up forcing myself through a lot of books I otherwise wouldn't have read. Now that I don't really use NG, I have zero relationship with HMH, and I'll probably read like 3 of their books this year.

Imprint # of Books Read Average Rating
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt4 3
Graphia 4 3.38
HMH Books for Children 3 3.5

Honestly, though I'm not sure how representative this data would be of my reading had NetGalley not been part of the equation, I'm not feeling a burning desire for HMH books. Well, except for Gina Damico's Croak series, which is published under the Graphia imprint; those books rock and everyone should love them.

HarperCollins
Harper I've actually not really had much of a relationship with, but I won a couple of their giveaways on FB when they did that, and they have the prettiest covers, which lured me into buying/borrowing more of their books. Oh, also, their adult group makes good use of TLC Book Tours, which I love. Thus, I read 46 Harper books over 10 imprints.

Imprint # of Books Read Average Rating
Katherine Tegen 3 3
HarperTeen 8 3.06
Balzer + Bray 9 3.56
HarperCollins 4 3.75
Harper 4 3.5
Harper Audio 10 3.45

Harper's one of the publishers where I feel like imprint can be most telling. I feel like I definitely need to watch out for HarperTeen books in particular. While I do really, really like some (Something Strange and Deadly, I'm looking at you), they tend to fall flat for me really reliably; I have two 1.5s and a 2 for HarperTeen books. Katherine Tegen's average is from a 2, a 3, and a 4, so I really don't think that's enough to make a judgment. I believe the HarperCollins imprint is where they publish their premier titles, like Lauren Oliver, so I'm not surprised it's the highest average. Pretty much all Harper books are hit or miss for me, though.

Tor
While Tor is not a big publisher, they attract my attention often, because they publish the sort of books I love, namely fantasy. Over 2012, I read 10 Tor books across three imprints.

Imprint # of Books Read Average Rating
Tor Books5 3.8
Tor Teen 4 4.13

Basically, I love fantasy. I mean, look at those ratings. Fantasy is my home genre, the one I've been reading the longest. Tor publishes primarily fantasy and science fiction, and I eat that stuff up. I hope to have more Tor in 2013.

To Sum Up
I'm sharing this just for fun, though I don't know if it will be interesting for anyone but me. A year's data isn't necessarily enough to make any big decisions off of, but I will continue to track this as time goes on, which will hopefully help guide me to books I love and save me from falling for pretty covers.

Labels:

20 Comments:

Blogger Kristin said...

I thought this post was great! I never thought to track publisher ratings. It would probably help save me a lot of hard reading.
Kristin @ Book Sniffers Anonymous

January 3, 2013 at 3:23 PM  
Blogger Christina said...

Glad you liked it! I feel a bit ridiculous doing it, but I hope it helps me in the long run!

January 3, 2013 at 3:31 PM  
Blogger KM said...

This...was an awesome idea!! Harper is typically my fav, then maybe Simon &Schuster, then Ramdom. Penguin is really hit or miss for me. Typically, miss. With the exception of Beth Revis

January 3, 2013 at 3:54 PM  
Blogger Julie@My5monkeys said...

wow I enjoyed this telling with publishers and data. I am thinking I should do that with all my books read. Yeah but some imprints do better than others is true and covers help alot LOL

January 3, 2013 at 4:36 PM  
Blogger Wendy Darling said...

I definitely pay attention to imprints, Christina. Some of them tend to be consistent winners for me, too, although I use it more as a "makes my ears perk up" than an avoidance strategy. I've been surprised by the depth of some of the titles published this year by some houses that also publish some of my least favorite titles, so...you just never know. Fun to look at stats, though!

January 3, 2013 at 4:42 PM  
Blogger Henry Circle said...

Girl, you are organized! And also, judging by all the books on your charts here, very busy!

January 3, 2013 at 4:53 PM  
Blogger roro said...

i wish i was that organized. haha

January 3, 2013 at 6:02 PM  
Blogger kara-karina@Nocturnal Book Reviews said...

I'm pretty sure I've got somewhat similar ratings for the publishers I prefer. Tor seems to get most of my high ratings, followed by Orbit, Simon & Schuster and HarperCollins. Bloomsbury is a hit and miss, so as Penguin, and St. Martins mostly miss for me. I can't find many of their releases that suit me.
I love your ratings, Christina! Really interesting, they always make me think and compare.

January 3, 2013 at 6:13 PM  
Blogger Kimberly @ On the Wings of Books said...

I think this is great! And helpful, something I wish I would have done for 2012.

January 3, 2013 at 8:52 PM  
Blogger Kelly said...

Wow, this is awesome! It's got me super tempted to try something similar - but I can only imagine how long it might take. I don't know that I've ever really paid attention to publishers/imprints...maybe I should!

January 3, 2013 at 9:02 PM  
Blogger Bookworm1858 said...

This is a great idea; it's something I was planning on doing this year and after your interesting results, I'm definitely following through.

January 3, 2013 at 10:12 PM  
Blogger Gina @ My Precious said...

Have you read anything by the new publisher Strange Chemistry? I've read two so far and fell in love with the both of them: Pantomime and The Assassin's Curse.

January 3, 2013 at 11:40 PM  
Blogger Jenni @ Alluring Reads said...

huh I had never thought of tracking something like this by publisher, I wonder what my stats would look like. It's a neat idea for sure!

January 4, 2013 at 12:20 PM  
Blogger Blythe Harris said...

Oooh, this is interesting! I think the pub I have the best relationship with is HarperTeen, as they've published some really good 2013 releases that I've read so far. (Though with HarperTeen, some of their books tend to be awesome, and others tend to be really, really awful. There doesn't seem to be a middle. With them, you're either awesome, or you suck.)

January 6, 2013 at 10:56 AM  
Blogger Nimue said...

That's an amazing idea! I should do this too.
Did you manually make up a spreadsheet or can you export data from goodreads?

January 6, 2013 at 11:44 AM  
Blogger Renae said...

This is a very interesting idea! I haven't noticed any publishers I always tend to enjoy, but I do know of one that I've given only 1 stars to for all of their books.

I should keep track of this in 2013. If I get the time...

January 7, 2013 at 8:13 PM  
Blogger Sugar and Snark said...

Thanks so much for this post! It inspired me to do the same :)
http://sugarandsnark.co.za/?p=7275

January 13, 2013 at 11:39 AM  
Blogger Christina said...

That's so cool!

January 14, 2013 at 9:48 AM  
Blogger Jenny said...

I love this so much. Now I have to put every book I've ever read into a chart for analyzing! I've thought about doing something similar to this for a while, just for myself because I'd like to know which publishers and imprints mesh best with my tastes, based on statistics. (Cause it probably isn't the same as what I think the results would be.) But it always seems so daunting a task. I'm motivated by your awesome. Whether I'll get to it or not remains to be seen. :)

Seriously, great post.

January 22, 2013 at 2:34 PM  
Blogger Christina said...

Oh thanks! I'm happy to have inspired you (maybe). :-p

It's daunting when you have to go back and do it, but if you update every week or two, it's not too bad.

January 22, 2013 at 4:06 PM  

Post a Comment

Every comment is appreciated and I will almost always respond, because I love conversing about books!

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home