<data:blog.pageTitle/>

This Page

has moved to a new address:

http://readeroffictions.com

Sorry for the inconvenience…

Redirection provided by Blogger to WordPress Migration Service
A Reader of Fictions: Review + Giveaway: Judging a Book by Its Lover

A Reader of Fictions

Book Reviews for Just About Every Kind of Book

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Review + Giveaway: Judging a Book by Its Lover

Judging a Book by Its Lover: A Field Guide to the Hearts and Minds of Readers Everywhere

Author: Lauren Leto
Pages: 269
Publisher: Harper Perennial
Publication Date: October 2, 2012
Source: Publisher for review

Description from Goodreads:
Want to impress the hot stranger at the bar who asks for your take on Infinite Jest? Dying to shut up the blowhard in front of you who’s pontificating on Cormac McCarthy’s “recurring road narratives”? Having difficulty keeping Francine Prose and Annie Proulx straight?

For all those overwhelmed readers who need to get a firm grip on the relentless onslaught of must-read books to stay on top of the inevitable conversations that swirl around them, Lauren Leto’s Judging a Book by Its Lover is manna from literary heaven! A hilarious send-up of—and inspired homage to—the passionate and peculiar world of book culture, this guide to literary debate leaves no reader or author unscathed, at once adoring and skewering everyone from Jonathan Franzen to Ayn Rand to Dostoyevsky and the people who read them.


First Sentence: "The first book I ever loved was a book about a monster in a child's closet."

Review:
As you might guess, I am a bit of a reader. As such, one of the things I enjoy doing when not reading is discussing literature. In Leto's book, I can sort of read and discuss reading all at once, albeit in a format where the discussion is rather one-sided with me unable to respond to Leto's opinions. Leto's work is for book lovers, or, perhaps even more, for those of us who want to pretend we've read all the most pretentious works but haven't.

Judging a Book by Its Lover, like most books containing short snippets of story or essay, is a bit of mish mash. Some of the sections entertained me and resulted in my wanting to be best buds with Lauren Leto. Other sections made me roll my eyes at Lauren Leto's handing down of her mighty opinion to the masses, much of which I didn't agree with. Leto's observations will primarily be entertaining to those who a) get the references and b) share her opinions. When she snarks at something I hated, I laugh along merrily. However, when the snark turns on beloved books, I could not help but be annoyed, especially since much of the snark came with no context or backing whatsoever.

One of Leto's bits of snark that bothered me in its inaccuracy comes from the lengthy section "Stereotyping People by Favorite Author," in which she asserts that those whose favorite author is Jane Austen - since they are totally the same in their writing style, these four people - are "girls who made out with other girls in college when they were going through a 'phase.'" Really, Lauren Leto? I would have gone more for the "girls who are always disappointed that real men don't measure up to fictional ones and remain single forever." Also mean, but more applicable to the fan base, which includes myself. Besides, for someone claiming to have so much knowledge of reading and its culture, why does she make the rookie mistake of pairing Austen and Brontës as though they're the same?

I guess I just felt that Leto was often overly brutal toward an author or a book in an effort to be edgy and funny, and, more importantly, to show how clever Lauren Leto is. I got the distinct sense that things she enjoys are awesome and to be judged as such, and things she doesn't automatically suck. Well, isn't that nice. For all that her posturing frustrated me, I actually preferred the snippets of her life to the gimmicky bits and lists. I wish it had been a bit more memoir, a bit less book snob.

The long lists, "Stereotyping People by Favorite Author" and "How to Fake It" drag on and on, not especially fun to read back to back. The latter gives key information for those who want to pretend they've read an author they haven't. They both run on too long, taking on a number of figures I've never even heard of, which, given that I spend a lot of time looking at books, makes me wonder about relevance to the average reader. In the stereotypes, it definitely felt as though people liked that so she wrote as many as she could, resulting in the forced feeling to many of them.

Obviously, I had a number of issues with this book. However, there were good things and I did enjoy reading it more than I didn't. When not sniping, Leto can actually be quite funny. She clearly loves books, which is always good, and advocates reading strongly, even if it has to be things she denigrates. In addition, there are a lot of fun facts to be learned, like that Norman Mailer liked to punch people and that I should never touch a Charles Bukowski novel.

If you're a book lover that wants to judge most of the books released in the last ten years and some classics, Judging a Book by Its Lover will help you with that. This one is for snark release, not for too much serious analysis though.

I'm offering up my review copy for giveaway. US readers, just fill out THIS FORM by Thursday October 4 to enter.

Rating: 3/5

Favorite Quote: "The most important thing about reading is not the level of sophistication of the books on your shelf. There is no prerequisite reading regimen for being a bookworm."

Labels: , , , , , ,

7 Comments:

Blogger Bekka @ Pretty Deadly Reviews said...

I sort of figured it was going to be a bit pretentious. I feel like it happens a lot when talking about books, especially classics. But it still sounds entertaining, and I really want to read it, if only to see how I'm judged.

September 27, 2012 at 12:53 AM  
Blogger Steena said...

Are the Brontës and Austen so often paired together because they are historical female authors? Because they really have nothing in common and it's my understanding that the Brontë sisters were very derisive of Austen's work. I also hate the assumption that love of Austen is rooted in the romance. I'm not saying I don't enjoy Lizzie and Darcy or Emma and Knightley but my favorite of Austen's books is Northanger Abbey and I love it because of the humor. Tilney's sarcasm and teasing is the absolute best and it's the wit between Darcy and Lizzie I like, not the romance.

I'm intrigued by this book but am wary too.

September 27, 2012 at 10:14 AM  
Blogger fakesteph said...

Not sure if it is one hundred percent my thing, but sounds fun.

September 27, 2012 at 11:34 AM  
Blogger Jenni @ Alluring Reads said...

I thought this sounded hilarious, but being someone who hasn't read like.. any of the classics I don't think it would be my cup of tea. I saw someone read a few lines from it and thought it sounded great, I'm always up for some snark! Great review!

September 27, 2012 at 11:47 AM  
Blogger Christina said...

Haha, then it's perfect for you. It was entertaining, but may make you want to throw it occasionally. :-p

September 27, 2012 at 10:14 PM  
Blogger Christina said...

It's worth giving a try.

TILNEY IS MY FAVORITE. Northanger is my favorite too. How did I not know this about you?

September 27, 2012 at 10:17 PM  
Blogger Christina said...

Eh, it's good if you want to know something about the classics, just enough to mock them. lol.

September 27, 2012 at 10:18 PM  

Post a Comment

Every comment is appreciated and I will almost always respond, because I love conversing about books!

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home